Skip to content

fix: rename credentialId to clusterId in ClustersClient methods#575

Open
Jah-yee wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:nextfrom
Jah-yee:next
Open

fix: rename credentialId to clusterId in ClustersClient methods#575
Jah-yee wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:nextfrom
Jah-yee:next

Conversation

@Jah-yee
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Jah-yee Jah-yee commented Apr 14, 2026

Good day,

This PR addresses issue #567 by renaming the parameter from credentialId to clusterId in the exists() and deleteClient() methods of ClustersClient.ts.

This is a purely cosmetic rename with no functional impact but improves code clarity and alignment with:

  • The Cluster ID Architecture documented in copilot-instructions.md
  • Other ClustersClient methods: getClient(clusterId), getExistingClient(clusterId)
  • All methods in CredentialCache.ts which consistently use clusterId

The inconsistency appears to be a naming oversight — functionally, both parameters are used as keys into the same _clients Map which is keyed by clusterId.

Thank you for your work on this project. I hope this small fix is helpful. Please let me know if there's anything to adjust.

Warmly, RoomWithOutRoof

Rename parameter from credentialId to clusterId in exists() and deleteClient()
methods to align with the Cluster ID Architecture and improve code clarity.

Good day,

This PR addresses issue microsoft#567 by renaming the parameter from credentialId to
clusterId in the exists() and deleteClient() methods of ClustersClient.ts.

This is a purely cosmetic rename with no functional impact but improves code
clarity and alignment with:
- The Cluster ID Architecture documented in copilot-instructions.md
- Other ClustersClient methods: getClient(clusterId), getExistingClient(clusterId)
- All methods in CredentialCache.ts which consistently use clusterId

Thank you for your work on this project. I hope this small fix is helpful.
Please let me know if there's anything to adjust.

Warmly, RoomWithOutRoof
@Jah-yee Jah-yee requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2026 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant