elasticsearch bulk upload in smaller chunks#1199
Open
raboof wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
since NixOS#1189 it seems the unstable crossed some threshold and is causing gateway timeouts while performing bulk upload calls. If that problem persists then let's see if splitting the upload in smaller chunks helps.
Member
Author
|
Hmm it succeeded the third time... but maybe we should still make the chunks smaller as it seems we're just on the edge. |
tomberek
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
since #1189 it seems the unstable crossed some threshold and is causing gateway timeouts while performing bulk upload calls. If that problem persists then let's see if splitting the upload in smaller chunks helps.
Seen twice now - I just started a third attempt, let's see if that times out as well, if so try with this change.
Towards #1197