You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: java/ql/src/Likely Bugs/Concurrency/ScheduledThreadPoolExecutorZeroThread.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
## Overview
2
2
3
-
According to the Java documentation on `ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor`, it is not a good idea to set `corePoolSize` to zero, since doing so indicates the executor to keep 0 threads in its pool and the executor will serve no purpose.
3
+
According to the Java documentation on `ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor`, it is not a good idea to set `corePoolSize` to zero, since doing so instructs the executor to keep 0 threads in its pool and the executor will serve no purpose.
0 commit comments