Skip to content

Commit 03ca0c9

Browse files
committed
upscaled images
replaced ol with ul
1 parent b495558 commit 03ca0c9

File tree

3 files changed

+6
-6
lines changed

3 files changed

+6
-6
lines changed

articles/postgresql/troubleshoot/how-to-identify-slow-queries-elastic-clusters.md

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ The `global_pid` associated with the long-running query is the same, which means
5959

6060
### Identify the tables and their distribution type in the query
6161

62-
1. The distributed tables
63-
1. The reference tables
64-
1. The colocation tables
62+
- The distributed tables
63+
- The reference tables
64+
- The colocation tables
6565

6666
If the query uses regular tables, change them to either reference tables or colocation tables. To find this information, use the following query.
6767

@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ WHERE a.colocation_id <> b.colocation_id;
105105

106106
What to look for in the preceding query:
107107

108-
1. If your tables are listed, consider colocating them. Colocating tables prevents:
108+
- If your tables are listed, consider colocating them. Colocating tables prevents:
109109
- Data reshuffling across nodes
110110
- Network overhead
111111
- Temp file spills
112112

113113
You can also identify these symptoms by reviewing the execution plans of your query. Pay attention to these action types:
114114

115-
1. Distributed Repartition Join
116-
1. Distributed Subplan/Union
115+
- Distributed Repartition Join
116+
- Distributed Subplan/Union
117117

118118
### Solution
119119

24.2 KB
Loading
565 KB
Loading

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)